<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>GeoCurrents</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.geocurrents.info</provider_url><author_name>Martin W. Lewis</author_name><author_url>https://www.geocurrents.info/blog/author/martin-lewis/</author_url><title>Geographical Patterns in the Alabama Primary Election - GeoCurrents</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="ASZfwaNjio"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.geocurrents.info/blog/2012/03/14/geographical-patterns-in-the-alabama-primary-election/"&gt;Geographical Patterns in the Alabama Primary Election&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.geocurrents.info/blog/2012/03/14/geographical-patterns-in-the-alabama-primary-election/embed/#?secret=ASZfwaNjio" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Geographical Patterns in the Alabama Primary Election&#x201D; &#x2014; GeoCurrents" data-secret="ASZfwaNjio" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://www.geocurrents.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Alabama-primary-race-income-map.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>889</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>742</thumbnail_height><description>The recent Republican presidential primary in Alabama reveals some interesting geographical patterns. As the first two maps indicate, the so-called Establishment candidate, Mitt Romney, did well in the wealthier and more urban parts of the state. The one major exception here was Madison County in the far north, home of the George C. Marshall Space [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
