Recent Focused Series »

Indo-European Origins
Siberia
Northern California
The Caucasus
Imaginary Geography
Home » GeoNotes, Uncategorized

“Mapping Stereotypes” Farcical Maps

Submitted by on June 28, 2012 – 4:36 pm 7 Comments |  
Yanko Tsvetkov’s farcical Mapping Stereotypes series humorously represents the views that people of various countries, mostly in Europe, hold of other nations. Many of the maps from the Bulgarian graphic designer label Europe’s countries with stereotypes that people of different nations in the region hold about them. Examples of such maps include “Europe According to Italians” and “Europe According to Bulgarians.” Particularly entertaining are the maps that deviate from this pattern, such as “Italy According to Posh Italians,” “The World According to Israel,” and “The World According to Americans.”

The labels in the European maps that make up the bulk of the series offer intriguing geopolitical perspectives. “Europe According to Germany,” for example, evokes Germany’s greater pre-World War II territorial extent, referring to the Baltic states as “old neighbors.” In “Europe According to Russians,” Eastern Ukraine, which has a predominant Russian population and favors Russia in foreign policy, carries the tag “Southern Russia.” In the same map the Russian clientstates of Abkhazia and South Ossetia appear as “brothers” and “sisters,” respectively. The map of France’s view of Europe labels Algeria as “France woz here,” alluding to the country’s former status as a part of France, but neglects to include the erstwhile colonies of Morocco and Tunisia.


“Italy According to Posh Italians” is of particular interest. This map highlights the frustration of many in the wealthier north that their disproportionate tax payments help support the poorer south. Sicily and southern Italy appear with the demeaning labels “Somalia” and “Ethiopia,” respectively. “The World According to Israel,” one of the few non-European maps from Mapping Stereotypes, portrays the country as self-centered, placing it in the middle of a diagram reminiscent of a schematic of the solar system. The map represents Iran as rogue space debris and the United States as a planet orbiting close to Israel, on which the disputed territories of the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and Golan Heights appear as “sun spots.”


The collection includes several maps from the perspective of the United States. These echo the themes found in similar farcical maps, sharing the ascription of communism to Russia, mass-produced goods to China, and AIDS to Africa. However, some of the labels seem uncharacteristic of an American perspective. While the maps mock American ignorance of the world, they in certain cases presuppose detailed geographical knowledge in the American public at large. It seems unlikely that the person who would associate the country Turkey with a “Thanksgiving meal” or refer to Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan as “Kwpzsfrstan” and “Szwrkstan” would be knowledgeable enough to associate the Tupamaro movement with Uruguay. The same map also labels Indonesia as “Mesoindia,” a term that makes little sense.

Mapping Stereotypes is an impressive collection of farcical maps that, while sometimes unusual and confusing, offers a great range of insights into how different peoples view the world.

Previous Post
«
Next Post
»

Subscribe For Updates

It would be a pleasure to have you back on GeoCurrents in the future. You can sign up for email updates or follow our RSS Feed, Facebook, or Twitter for notifications of each new post:
        

Commenting Guidelines: GeoCurrents is a forum for the respectful exchange of ideas, and loaded political commentary can detract from that. We ask that you as a reader keep this in mind when sharing your thoughts in the comments below.

  • http://twitter.com/nagunak Steven Lubman

    The author of the maps has impressive knowledge of other people’s prejudices about foreigners

    • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

      Good point!

  • Sebastian Pado

    I reckon the maps are less meant to show geographical knowledge but rather indicate associations with state names.

    • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

      Good point, Sebastian. But crucially these associations are stereotypical for this or that national group, and often the knowledge of geography (or rather the lack thereof) plays a role in determining these stereotypes. Some of the maps also feature “redrawn borders”, where the groups in question has only the vague idea about the geography of this or that place. What I find interesting about these maps is that they represent stereotypes not only about the groups mapped but also about the groups whose stereotypes are supposedly represented (whether they are ignorant of geography, racist, etc.)

  • http://www.facebook.com/keith.ruffles Keith Ruffles

    Of course, the idea that certain national groups hold fixed stereotypes about others is in itself a stereotype…

  • http://www.facebook.com/keith.ruffles Keith Ruffles

     Of course, the idea that certain national groups hold fixed stereotypes about others is in itself a stereotype…

    • ckremer

      An excellent point, Keith. While the works from “Mapping Stereotypes” contain elements of truth, it would be wrong to think that most Americans, Northern Italians, or Russians would hold the beliefs that appear in the maps discussed above. In that same vein, Internet users might enjoy and repost such humorous maps not only because they may hold the views represented in the maps but also perhaps because they believe (correctly or incorrectly) that certain people actually think that way. For example, Internet users viewing “Asia According to Americans” might find the “Thanksgiving Meal” label on Turkey funny, not because they themselves would make that association but because they can relate to the stereotype of Americans shown in the map.