Recent Focused Series »

Indo-European Origins
Northern California
The Caucasus
Imaginary Geography
Home » Gender News, Politics News, South Asia

Ambikesh Mahapatra Cartoon Incident in West Bengal

Submitted by on May 2, 2012 – 10:21 pm 6 Comments |  

Ambikesh Mahapatra, a chemistry professor of the prestigious Jadavpur University, sent an email to 65 of his friends. The email contained a political cartoon criticizing Mamata Banerjee, West Bengal’s first female Chief Minister. The professor was assaulted by alleged Trinamool Congress activists, then arrested by the police. While as the victim of the assault Professor Mahapatra was forced to spend a night at a police station, his attackers – Amit Sardar, Arup Mukherjee, Sheikh Mustafa and Nishikanta Gharai – were arrested on the next day and released on bail just two hours later. In the meantime, the cartoon was being shared across social networking websites. The professor’s arrest led to outrage in Kolkata and across the Web, with many people posting angry messages on Twitter, such as author Taslima Nasreen’s “Shame! Shame! A professor is arrested over a cartoon in Kolkata. It’s an extreme violation of freedom of expression!”

Ms. Banerjee was brought to power by a landslide victory, defeating the Communist Party of India (Marxist)-led Left Front government, which ruled the state for 34 years, the world’s record for a democratically-elected communist government. But more recently, Ms. Banerjee has been called by her critics “whimsical”, “megalomaniac”, “eccentric”, and a “populist politician”. In the wake of the cartoon incident, the Left Front leader Brinda Karat joined the critics by calling this episode “a clear assault on the democratic right of freedom of expression”. Mamata Banerjee personally defended the professor’s arrest and was also behind the state government’s instruction to 2,500 public libraries on what newspapers they can stock: several leading papers, including the most widely read Bengali daily newspaper Anandabazar Patrika and all English dailies, were dropped. As a result, Ms. Karat accused Ms. Banerjee of dictatorial measures: “she decides on what people should read in library, tomorrow she will tell us what to think… she cannot tolerate a single word of criticism”. Other pundits, such as BD Sharma, the mediator in the recent Maoist hostage crisis in Odisha, agree that “this is a fascist trend that people won’t appreciate”.

But the violation of the freedom of expression is only one disconcerting aspect of this story. The offending cartoon depicted Mamata Banerjee conspiring with now Railway Minister Mukul Roy to force a resignation of Mr Roy’s predecessor in the Rail Ministry, Dinesh Trivedi. Curiously, while the cartoon is purely political in nature, the charges brought against Prof. Mahapatra included eve-teasing (the Indian term for sexual harassment) and humiliating a woman. It is disturbing because treating any critique of a female politician as sexual harassment helps strengthen the anti-feminist argument that women cannot and should not participate in “big politics”.

And what of Professor Mahapatra? Initially, he apologized for sending the cartoon, but as reported by HindustanTimes, after being released from police custody he said that he was not sorry and would again send such emails in the future, but he also betrayed his fear for his life: “I’m not free of insecurity”.

Previous Post
Next Post

Subscribe For Updates

It would be a pleasure to have you back on GeoCurrents in the future. You can sign up for email updates or follow our RSS Feed, Facebook, or Twitter for notifications of each new post:

Commenting Guidelines: GeoCurrents is a forum for the respectful exchange of ideas, and loaded political commentary can detract from that. We ask that you as a reader keep this in mind when sharing your thoughts in the comments below.

  • James T. Wilson

    Perfectly dreadful.  Of course, I would be curious to know how much of a guiding principle freedom of speech is for the CPI(M).

    • Asya Pereltsvaig

      Good point!

      • Martin W. Lewis

        Unlike India’s Maoists, members of the CP(M) have generally adhered to democratic principles in recent decades.  But the following information, from Wiki Answers, is also significant: “With regard to membership, it is now a democratic party in which any one can take membership. But as regard to discipline, though it is now a democratic party, it adheres to cadre party discipline laws allowing no freedom of speech to members, which contradiction is the sole reason for the turmoil now in that party.”Read more:

        • James T. Wilson

          As fate would have it, I was just yesterday having my students distinguish between democracy and liberalism.  I am not surprised that the CPM are democratic, at least when out of power, but I am also not surprised that is one of the many democratic entities that don’t protect freedom of speech.
          The article also makes the mouth-droppingly essentialist assertion that “the pacifistic Indian mind won’t tolerate aggressive revolutionary tendencies.”  I guess then such a mind would not accept pogroms of Muslims, Hindus, or Christians, which is why Partition went so swimmingly.  Sorry for the sarcasm, but the article sounds like it was written by someone who knows nothing about Indian history.

          • Martin W. Lewis

            Or perhaps written by someone whose knowledge of Indian history is so ideologically distorted as to be worthless … although I suppose it is the same thing in the end. 

  • Pingback: Another Cartoon Controversy Strikes India « Culinary Geography « Cultural Geography « GeoCurrents

  • shanthi kumar

    Questdial India’s favorite local search engine provides information on all B2B and B2C Products and information Services. For information Dial 040-66666608