Focused Series »

Indo-European Origins
Northern California
The Caucasus
Imaginary Geography
Home » Cultural Geography, Elections, Geopolitics, South Asia

Red Tripura and the Geopolitics of Greater Bengal

Submitted by on June 1, 2011 – 8:41 pm 13 Comments |  
Map of Indian states by party of government, 2011India’s regional elections in early May 2011 saw the devastating defeat of the far left. After having ruled the 91-million-strong state of West Bengal for thirty-four years, the Communist Party of India (Marxist) [abbreviated as CPI(M)] lost 146 seats in the Legislative Assembly, retaining only 42. In what could be an epochal loss, the larger Left Alliance coalition did not win a single West Bengal district. The communists were also defeated in Kerala in the southwest—a long-time stronghold sometimes called Red Kerala. Only one Indian state, tiny Tripura in the northeast, currently has a communist government. In Tripura’s most recent legislative election (2008), the CPI(M) took forty-six of sixty seats, giving it its fourth consecutive term in power.

Soon after the routing of their fellows in West Bengal, Tripura’s Marxist authorities found themselves in hot water. On May 24, leaders of the opposition Congress Party vowed to undergo a hunger strike to protest “the replacement of Mahatma Gandhi’s name with Communist icon Vladimir Lenin in a Class 5 textbook.” Communist leaders countered that the discussion of Gandhi was simply moved to a different chapter. Congress Party activists were not mollified, arguing that the state’s textbooks more generally suffer from a “huge distortion of facts,” and are aimed at “brainwashing school students in line with Marxism.”


Tripura is a distinctive state. We have already noted its near engulfment by Bangladesh, giving it an unusually long andtroubled international border. Like its neighboring Indian states to the north and east, Tripura has long been plagued by ethnic tension and insurgency, although at present rebel activity is minimal. Disruptive protests commonly occur, however, and are sometimes violent. In late May 2011, authorities aimed water cannons at representatives of the Tripura Pradesh Youth Congress gathered in front of a police station. The demonstrators, affiliated with the mainstream Congress Party, were protesting the recent assault on one of their leaders by members of a rival student organization, the communist-linked Student’s Federation of India. According to the Times of India, the resulting imbroglio brought “rain-soaked Tripura to a complete standstill.”

West Bengal and the Original GerrymanderUnrest in Tripura is linked to the partition of British South Asia in 1947 and the subsequent independence of Bangladesh. Partition broke up the Bengali-speaking region, one of the world’s largest cultural areas; with some 250 million speakers, Bengali is usually counted as the sixth mostly widely spoken language on earth, surpassing Portuguese, Russian, Japanese, and German. In 1947, the Hindu-majority Bengali districts of the west and north went to India, forming West Bengal, while the eastern zone went to East Pakistan, later Bangladesh. (The oddly shaped West Bengal evokes the original “Gerrymander,” as illustrated by the image to the right.) Several million Hindus eventually fled East Pakistan, most settling in West Bengal. Hundreds of thousand, however, headed east into what had been the princely state of Tripura, a minor kingdom under British dominion. As a result, Tripura’s demographic balance underwent a tectonic shift; Bengalis, previously forming around twenty percent of the population, were catapulted to majority status with roughly seventy percent. If effect, Tripura became a third political unit of divided Bengal.

The flow of Hindu Bengali refugees into Tripura was not welcomed by the culturally distinctive indigenous inhabitants. Most local ethnic groups, including the once-dominant Tripuri, speak Tibeto-Burman languages and are historically linked to the peoples of what is now south-central China. Resentment against the newcomers led many indigenes to join one of the twenty-plus insurgent groups that made Tripura a bloody mess in the late twentieth century, as we shall see in a later post.

The “Bengalization” of Tripura also brought about a political transformation of the state, placing it firmly within the communist camp. In the early 20th century, educated Hindu Bengalis—who often styled themselves as the intellectual elite of India—generally embraced Marxism as a cerebral yet potent anti-colonial philosophy. Bengali Muslims, in contrast, generally espoused much more conservative beliefs. The migration of Hindu Bengalis into Tripura thus brought the local branch of the Communist party to power. West Bengal, as we have seen, witnessed the collapse of the communist vote in 2011; it remains to be seen whether Tripura will follow suit.

Map of Great Bengal and Greater SylhetAlthough conventional depictions of the Bengali region divide it east from west, Bangladesh from India, in actuality the Indian parts of greater “Bangla-land” almost surround Bangladesh. The eastern Bengali-speaking zone includes not only Tripura, but also Cachar district of southern Assam, site of the state’s second city, Silchar. In the north are the often over-looked districts of West Bengal’s “beak,” including Cooch Behar and its enclave-ridden border.

The internal coherence of this greater Bengali region, however, is itself suspect. The historical Sylhet region, including India’s Cachar and adjoining districts and Bangladesh’s Sylhet Division, is often excluded from the realm. The Sylheti tongue is not fully inter-intelligible with standard Bengali, and is thus often considered to be a separate language. Heavily influenced by Assamese, Sylheti was formerly written in its own script. Under the British, the entire Sylhet region was administered as part of Assam; it too was spit with partition, with the Muslim-majority west going to East Pakistan (hence Bangladesh), and the Hindi-majority east staying with Assam in India.

Also of interest is the fact that the substantial Bangladesh immigrant community in Britain is mostly Sylheti—ninety-five percent according to some sources. Relations between Sylhetis and other Bangladeshis in London are strained, as demonstrated in a fascinating 2008 internet discussion thread entitled “Why Do Dhakaiyas Hate Sylhetis So?” (“Dhakaiyas” are people from Dhaka, or more generally non-Sylheti Bangladeshis.) Muslim Sylhetis have a reputation for being much more devoted to fundamentalist interpretations of their faith than other Bangladeshis, a trait that has been linked to religious tensions in London’s Muslim-majority neighborhoods.

Previous Post
Next Post

Subscribe For Updates

It would be a pleasure to have you back on GeoCurrents in the future. You can sign up for email updates or follow our RSS Feed, Facebook, or Twitter for notifications of each new post:

Commenting Guidelines: GeoCurrents is a forum for the respectful exchange of ideas, and loaded political commentary can detract from that. We ask that you as a reader keep this in mind when sharing your thoughts in the comments below.

  • Asya Pereltsvaig

    Very interesting and informative posting, thank you!

    1) It would be interesting to see a map of communist influences vis-a-vis a map of economic development (such as the ones you’ve made for earlier postings). Kerala and Tripura are both fairly rich and developed, aren’t they?

    2) Bengali serves as a lingua franca, so over half of its supposed 250 million speakers speak it as a second language. Ethnologue lists it at 110 million *native* speakers ( If we count native speakers only, then Bengali does not surpass Japanese or Russian (and probably not Portuguese either, if Brazilian Portuguese is considered the same language as European Portuguese, despite the many grammatical differences).

    • imzy

      Wouldn’t the numbers for Japanese, Russian and Portuguese be a lot lower if you exclude the people who don’t speak it as a native language? The Ainu of Japan, the large ondingenous populations of Brazil and the large non Russian minorities: Kazakhs, Tatars, buryats, evenks?

      The data you gave is old bdesg alone has a pop. Of 160million and 157 million+ are Bengali. West Bengal has over 92million and 79 million+ are Bengali. Then add the native Bengali’s of Assam, Tripura, meghalaya, Bihar, Mizoram, and Manipur there are around 25 million. Add Bengali populations in other part of India its about 3million. Then add Bengali migrant populations around the world its around 10 million (middle east, far east, UK, us etc) . that totals the Bengali population around 275 million.

  • Thanks for comments, Asya. In regard to your first point, Kerala is above average in India in regard to per capita GDP ($1,450 vs. $1,100 in nominal terms for 2010), and well above above average in regard to social development. West Bengal, however, is below average in economic terms ($870),, and Tripura is lower still ($750).

    Good point in regard to Bengal being used as a lingua france. But the Wikipedia does claim that it has 181 million native speakers, which would still put it in 6th place. Ethnologue has similar numbers, but conveys them in a confusing manner, noting that there are 110 million speakers in Bangladesh (2001 census). But if you scroll down, you will see that it list 70,600,000 speakers in India (1997 datea.)

  • Imzy

    Yo’re flinging stereotypes, there hasnt been much radical islamic violence in the areas of bengali concentration in East London. Thta has happened in more Pakistani based areas like Luton (where groups like the EDL have arisen too). In addiiton, none of the 4 7/7 bombers were Bangladeshi. I’m not saying there are no Bengali, Sylheti or Bangladeshi terrorists; I’m just saying you’re a puppet of the 21st century media spouting the same stereotypes and lies they have fed the world.

  • Imzy

    In addition, you have no idea of the subject matter you’re on about, referring to a silly childish thread. It is simply a matter of regional bickering. Scotland is different to England, but also we might as well say the North of England is different.
    Sylheti is a dialect of Bengali. Before 1874, there was no Assam, the British created it. And when they took Sylhet they tried to Hindi-ise it and Assamese-ise it.
    What is more West Assam is Bengali: Goalpariya is the same as Rangpuri and Kamrupi is another dialect of Bengali. Finally, in East Assam, there was a precursor of Bengali people, but Ahoms came from Thailand and took the land and have since tried to kill Bengali Muslims living there (that came 150 years ago)

  • Samuel Fanning

    NE India should be partitionned between China and Myanmar or be given independance… The Chin, Kachin and Nagas of Myanmar might want to join that new state.

    • Zabir Hasan

      Give Nagaland to nagas people. Give west Bengal to Bangladesh.give arakand to Bangladesh.

  • Imran Hussain

    The usage of a ridiculous thread and inflammatory hearsay further highlights the inadequate nature of this article. The description of relations between different Bengalis being strained just because you have read an online thread is childish at best.

    How many thousands of articles are out there about Dravidian vs North Indian tension? That’s is something far more likely to manifest in real life.

    The reality is Sylhetis for the overwhelmingly most part get on with Dhakaiyas, Chatgaiyas, and even Kolkatans. We’re all Bengali.

    Furthermore the sheet unacademic nature of this article further proves its lack of relevance. The Sylheti dialect is not like Assamese at all. Standard Assamese is closer to Standard Bangla than Sylheti is. In addition, Sylheti Bangla gas 75-85% intelligibility to Standard Bangla. This high percentage increases even more if you compare to to closer Eastern dialects like Dhakaiya, Moimonshinga (from Mymensingh).

    The fact that even now Assamese is grouped in the Bengali Assamese language group under Eastern Indo-Aryan languages is testament to its part in the Bengali family. The creation of it as a “separate” language is attributable to American Chrsitain missionaries who worked by divide and rule in the 19th century. The Eastern languages are Bengali, Odia and Bihari.

    Assamese or Ashami is, like Goalpariya, Kamrupi, Sylheti, Chatgaiya, Khortha etc a part of the Bengali identity. The Kolkata dialect is simply a standard chosen.

    Like how standard Hindi is sued over other dialects in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh etc.

    Historical knowledge is also extremely sub par. A 19th century census found 36.23% of the population of Tripura to be non- Kokborok and non tribal I.e mostly Bengali. The Jaintia Kings of Meghalata uses Bengali and Bengali script for communication with other kingdoms.

    The Bishnupriya Manipuri are Bengalis with a unique dialect east of Sylhet region now mostly living in the Sylhet region due to violence in Manipur. They also write with the Bengali script and speak a tongue in the Bengali Assamese family.

    British divide and rule politics carved up Bengal/Bangladesh which would include modern Bangladesh, West Bengal, Assam, Tripura, Manipur, Arakan, Meghalaya, Eastern Bihar and surrounding tribal parts.

    • Xiteru corvus naga

      i want to see unification of indian bengal in bangladesh . their culture everything is same .
      bangladesh became the victim of conspiracy of muslim league and congress
      i am supporter of Greater Bangladesh

      • Zabir Hasan

        I am indian but i am supporter of greater Bangladesh too.because bro the india is using west Bengal to Nagaland for their own use. And from history we know that’s this land belonged to Bangladesh. Bro i support you too.


    The Bengali speaking total Land (Bangla Desh,West Bengal,Tripura,Cachar and Goalpara with some south eastern Brngali domonated areas of Jharkhand) is as greater as the land of MYANMAR is and total population as equal as the population of But the unification two Bengals is quite not possible, due to only one great problem of religious extremism of Islamic fundamentalist of East Bengal. Bengali Hindus are too much liberal than Hindi speaking Hindus. But if the Islamic Fundamenlists of Opar Bangla does not change thier Jehadi Attitude and there wish for ethenic cleaning of their own neighbour East Bengali Hindus, why the Indian Bengali Hindus will enter in the creator of Islamic Volcano? Never. But Alas, being my wish to see this unification in my life time. It is quite not possible. Religious differences is not a very Petty matter.

  • Zabir Hasan

    I am Indian but i support greater Bangladesh.
    I don’t getting the rights of my in india as citizens. Because i am Muslim and Bengali they don’t like us.first problem i am muslim in hindu country and i am a Bengali and living in hindi cultural country. Pls help us Bangladeshi brothers. Pls help Nepali Bengali or Bhutanese border Bengali people help me.

    • Bhaskar Kumar Choudhury

      Zabir, You are perhaps Bengali Muslim. What you Bengali Muslims have done With Bengali Hindus in whole East Bengal? Noakhali Massacare in 1947 is a very small example of your large tyrany on Hindus in your Muslim Majority Areas, which is continiously going on. We Hindu Bengalies are happy in our West Bengal, Tripura and some other parts of India. How You Islamist Jehadis will treat with us in greater Bangla Desh? How can We believe You? So be Hindu first, then We may think about this.