Recent Focused Series »

Indo-European Origins
Siberia
Northern California
The Caucasus
Imaginary Geography
Home » Europe, Genetics, GeoNotes, Population Geography, Russia, Ukraine, and Caucasus

New Maps of Eurasian DNA from Oleg Balanovsky

Submitted by on March 18, 2013 – 5:36 am 6 Comments |  
The recent doctoral dissertation by Russian geneticist Oleg Balanovsky, Variability of gene pool in space and time: Data synthesis, genogeography, mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosome, contains a number of fascinating maps pertaining to the distribution of both Y-DNA and mitochondrial DNA haplogroups and other genetic markers across Eurasia. These maps reveal that the main genetic division divides Eurasia into western and eastern sub-regions; the boundary starts at the Caucasus and traverses through southern Urals, northern Kazakhstan, and southern Siberia, then follows the course of the Yenisey River.

Balanovsky_map1Another major finding is that the distribution of Y-DNA in European populations is highly structured, both geographically and ethnically: men from a given ethnic group tend to share a predominant Y-DNA haplogroup, often distinct from that of other ethnic groups. This pattern is visible in the map reproduced on the left, which shows areas of Europe where certain Y-DNA haplogroups peak at over 35%. Such zones cover most of the continent, demonstrating that patrilineality and paternal founder effects have had a significant role in the formation of the modern European gene pool. Indeed, continental Europe is dominated by just two related haplogroups: R1a and R1b. The zone in which R1a is frequent extends from Central Europe to the Volga-Ural region. The main R1b zone is located in Atlantic Europe, though smaller zones are found also to the south of the Ural Mountains. Curiously, R1a has also been found in Late Neolithic and Bronze Age remains all the way from present-day Germany to South Siberia, suggesting that perhaps it occupied a large area of Eurasia before the main R1b expansions across or even into Europe. Some researchers have tied the R1b haplogroup with the Indo-European expansion; another possibility is that the early speakers of Indo-European languages belonged to haplogroup R1a, as the remains from steppe kurgans tested to date are almost totally dominated by R1a. This issue remains highly controversial.

Balanovsky_map2The correlation between ethnic groups and Y-DNA is not perfect: for example, various Slavic-speaking peoples overlap to a great degree in terms of their Y-DNA haplogroups. In contrast, men from northern and southern Russian populations exhibit distinct patterns. Curiously, Y-DNA and mitochondrial DNA tell a similar story when it comes to northern Russian populations, contrary to some earlier studies. According to Balanovsky, women from the Russian north are closer to Norwegians, Germans, Poles, Lithuanians, and others than to Finno-Ugric-speaking groups. The map reproduced on the left shows genetic distance from northern Russian mtDNA: dark green areas are the closest and red ones are the farthest. These findings contradict an earlier theory that migration into what is now northern Russia was heavily gender-biased, with mostly Slavic-speaking men marrying local, Finnic-speaking women. Nor did Balanovsky find much trace of Central Asian nomadic groups in the Y-DNA and mitochondrial DNA of Eastern Europeans.

Languages and genes in North Caucasus

Balanovsky and his team also found a strong correlation between genetic and linguistic groups in North Caucasus, as discussed in an earlier GeoCurrents post: each language family has its own dominant Y-haplogroup, while many clusters of haplotypes in a given haplogroup are highly specific for a particular ethno-linguistic group. Moreover, Balanovsky and colleagues were able to tie the dates of specific haplotype clusters to linguistic dates for the divergence of various families and branches, as well as to historical evidence.

It should be noted, however, that such work tends to be a bit preliminary, as new studies of this sort often run counter to older studies. Still, Balanovsky’s work makes a significant contribution to the field, and GeoCurrents will continue to follow such research with great interest.

Previous Post
«
Next Post
»

Subscribe For Updates

It would be a pleasure to have you back on GeoCurrents in the future. You can sign up for email updates or follow our RSS Feed, Facebook, or Twitter for notifications of each new post:
        

Commenting Guidelines: GeoCurrents is a forum for the respectful exchange of ideas, and loaded political commentary can detract from that. We ask that you as a reader keep this in mind when sharing your thoughts in the comments below.

  • BorisDenisov

    Eurasia is somewhat larger than the maps

    • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

      Of course. I posted a small selection of maps from Balanovsky’s dissertation…

  • Dmitry Pruss

    There is a peculiar gap in the geography of their sample collection. No samples collected in Middle and Lower Volga Basin (below Kostroma), and the samples collected in Oka River Basin (Ryazan, also Tambov) were only analyzed for mtDNA (not Y-DNA). Note that the external data on Tatars and Mishars also have only mtDNA but not Y-DNA. Perhaps some of the Volga / Oka Russians descend from assimilated Mishars and bring Central Asian Y-chromosome into the picture, undermining Balanovsky’s claim of “zero inheritance from the Golden Horde”?

    • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

      Good point, thanks for bringing it up, Dmitry!

  • filmexpeditions

    I have been looking for the population of people with Eurasian DNA in the world.
    I know that “Eurasia,” covers about 4 billion people, but how many of them have Eurasian DNA?

    • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

      That’s an excellent question!