Recent Focused Series »

Indo-European Origins
Siberia
Northern California
The Caucasus
Imaginary Geography
Home » Cartography, Featured, GeoNotes, Geopolitics

Mappery and the Problems with “True” and “Real” Maps

Submitted by on April 18, 2013 – 4:32 pm 6 Comments |  
"Real" Map of PakistanThe useful website Mappery “was created for map enthusiasts to find, explore, and discuss great maps. Anyone can contribute maps, comments, and ratings to the site.” The site contains numerous maps, and is certainly worth exploring. Thankfully, users seldom exploit the site for propagandistic purposes. Mappery does contain, however, a few problematic political maps, such as the “Real Map of South Asia” posted here. This map not only appends all of Kashmir to Pakistan, a common and understandable maneuver, but also includes other parts of India in a future enlarged Pakistan.

Maps of "greater Pakistan"Such mapping is part of an established “greater Pakistan” cartographic genre, a few examples of which are included in the second illustration posted here. Some of these maps entail merely the hoped-for annexation of India’s portion of Kashmir, whereas others call for the addition of part or all of Afghanistan, as well as part or all of India and even Sri Lanka. Fantasy knows few bounds when it comes to nationalistic mapping. Such maps can be found on anti-Pakistan as well as pro-Pakistan webpages, as they are sometimes used in India to incite fears about Pakistani expansionism.

"True" Map of AzerbaijanNot all maps that purport to show “real” or “true” geopolitical conditions, however, necessarily fall into the propaganda category.  Mappery’s  “True Map of Azerbaijan,” for example, shows the area that Azerbaijan does actually control, rather than the area that its government, and the internationally community, regards as its legitimate territory. Still, it is impossible to avoid controversy here. Note that the map regards Nagorno-Karabakh as simply part of Armenia, whereas the Wikipedia describes it is “a de facto independent but unrecognized state.” The “true” situation of Nagorno-Karabakh, however, is actually highly ambiguous, and hence cannot nagorno-karabakh_occupation_mapeasily be captured in any mapping scheme.

 

 

Previous Post
«
Next Post
»

Subscribe For Updates

It would be a pleasure to have you back on GeoCurrents in the future. You can sign up for email updates or follow our RSS Feed, Facebook, or Twitter for notifications of each new post:
        

Commenting Guidelines: GeoCurrents is a forum for the respectful exchange of ideas, and loaded political commentary can detract from that. We ask that you as a reader keep this in mind when sharing your thoughts in the comments below.

  • Asya Pereltsvaig

    WARNING: there’s some security problems with the Mappery website! Pity…

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000526662907 Edward Dela Peña

    Notice that Bangladesh was not included in either Greater Pakistan map. It’s either they just forgot Bangladesh or they have forgotten Bangladesh because they felt they were betrayed after those events in 1971.

    • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

      That’s a great point!

    • http://geocurrents.info Martin W. Lewis

      That is interesting, especially seeing as Bangladesh is now experiencing a major conflict over war-crime trials connected to the 1971 war that resulted in its independence from Pakistan.

  • Pingback: [BLOG] Some Friday links | A Bit More Detail

  • afyangg .

    Another instance of unscientific and crazily expansionist map is:
    http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kaartfransvlaanderen.jpg

    Flemish never was spoken that much south and the alleged border between French and Flemish is just insane and inane.

    Quite absurdly the map does not indicate the actual border that used to exist for centuries from Calais (written Kales) to Lille (written Rijsel).

    • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

      Thank you, this is very interesting.