Recent Focused Series »

Indo-European Origins
Siberia
Northern California
The Caucasus
Imaginary Geography
Home » Gender News, GeoNotes, Health, North America

Female Mortality on the Rise in Many U.S. Counties

Submitted by on April 14, 2013 – 5:48 pm 10 Comments |  
Female_mortality_map

A recent article in Health Affairs by David Kindig and Erika Cheng examined trends in male and female mortality rates from 1992–1996 to 2002–2006 in 3,140 US counties. What they found is a worrisome trend of female mortality on the rise in 42.8% of counties, depicted in red on the map reposted on the left. The situation with male mortality rates is much better, increasing in only 3.4% of counties. Historically, overall U.S. life expectancy has been increasing steadily over the decades, but a large subgroup of women was apparently left behind, “despite increasing medical care expenditures and public health efforts”, Kindig and Cheng point out. A strong regional pattern emerges from this map: many of the counties with worsened female mortality are found in southern states and the Midwest. In contrast, virtually no county in New England showed a decline.

female_mortality_presidential_elections_2012

It is not clear what could explain this pattern. One of the readers commented that this map bears strong resemblance to a recent voting map, with “red” counties with worsening female mentality corresponding to “red” pro-Republican areas. As can be seen from the maps on the left, an uncanny similarity between the two maps indeed exists, especially if one adds the green-colored areas on the mortality map to the red ones. However, not all patterns found on the election map are replicated on the mortality map. For example, the heavily African-American Democrat-voting belt that stretches through the southern states posts worsening female mortality rates just like the surrounding Republican-voting areas. Moreover, several Republican-voting counties in central Texas, northern Utah, southeastern New Mexico, California’s Central Valley, and elsewhere exhibit substantial improvement in female mortality.

obesity_by_county_large

US-stroke-map

The authors of the study looked at a number of factors that might explain why female morality went up in some counties but down in others. A somewhat surprising finding was that the availability of medical care—measured by the number of primary care providers or percentage of uninsured—didn’t really make a difference. “Female mortality rates were not predicted by any of the medical care factors,” they write. As the maps on the left indicate, there is a correlation between declining longevity among women and such health problems as obesity, diabetes, and stroke in much of the Southeast; however, elsewhere it falls apart. Nor is it clear why these issues have a particularly strong impact on female life expectancy. Socioeconomic factors, however, seem to be better predictors of female mortality. Kindig and Cheng found “significant associations between mortality rates and some of these factors, such as smoking rates for both sexes. But socioeconomic factors such as the percentage of a county’s population with a college education and the rate of children living in poverty had equally strong or stronger relationships to fluctuations in mortality rates”.

As Bill Gardner, a psychologist who studies the mental health service system for children, points out, these figures are worrisome not only because they depict a shocking pattern of female hardship in many communities, but also because they raise questions about children’s health. “The mental and physical health of mothers is a key determinant in children’s growth and development”, Garnder writes, “but when women are not able to maintain their own health, how well can they nurture their children?”

Previous Post
«
Next Post
»

Subscribe For Updates

It would be a pleasure to have you back on GeoCurrents in the future. You can sign up for email updates or follow our RSS Feed, Facebook, or Twitter for notifications of each new post:
        

Commenting Guidelines: GeoCurrents is a forum for the respectful exchange of ideas, and loaded political commentary can detract from that. We ask that you as a reader keep this in mind when sharing your thoughts in the comments below.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Peter-Rosa/1593565364 Peter Rosa

    More women smoke.

    • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

      You mean more than men do? I would love to see some maps or data on the smoking issue—let me know if you find some!

  • BorisDenisov

    Unclear, what is mortality?
    It might stem from aging

    • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

      That’s an interesting point. Though I don’t think that the rising female mortality can be explained wholly by aging because (a) the female mortality map is not all that dissimilar from the map of premature deaths (for both sexes), see below, and (b) why only female aging? and (c) why not even worse mortality figures in Florida, the “retirement state”? I think aging may be one of the factors but hardly the only one…

      • Stacy123456

        I agree. Women, on average out-live men, so why would a mass number of them start reversing such a long standing demographic trend.

        • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

          That’s one of the questions…

  • Stacy123456

    This is purely a pop-culture observation, but I’ve noticed (overheard and inquired about) many many younger men showing preferences of certain features in the opposite sex; namely obese features such as ‘thickness’, what they call ‘Muffin tops”, and ‘heavy thighs’. These are all mysterious to me, a guy who grew up during the late 70s and 80s when fit and trim was my generation of attractive features.
    This issue is surprising, given that, if you see one obese, unhealthy member of a couple, chances are the other is the same way. As my friend just said, you rarely see a couple where one is trim and healthy and the other is the complete opposite.

    Like i said, it’s purely anecdotal pop-culture observation, but I’ve asked others my age (male and female) and they report the same feedback from younger adults too.

    • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

      Interesting! I wonder why (if indeed!) such “obese” features are preferred… Because I agree that it’s near impossible to see a couple where one person is trim and fit and the other one is obese. Perhaps other readers would have an insight… Anyone?

      • a. nonny mous

        I know several couples where the husband is reeeally tall and skinny, and the wife is pretty short and… um, “heavy.” So it’s not THAT impossible.

        • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

          Well, I was talking about morbidly obese, not just “plump”, “heavy” or “overweight”. Couples typically share lifestyles so it makes them both either relatively healthy or relatively not. Of course, some discrepancies are possible, but I wonder how statistically significant such discrepancies are.